|
Abstract
| Oral Argument: |
Wednesday, March 28, 1984 |
| Oral Reargument: |
Tuesday, October 2, 1984 |
| Decision: |
Tuesday, January 15, 1985 |
| Issues: |
Civil Rights, Juveniles |
| Categories: |
education, fourth amendment, searches and
seizures | |
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
T.L.O. was a fourteen-year-old; she was accused
of smoking in the girls' bathroom of her high school. A principal at the school
questioned her and searched her purse, yielding a bag of marijuana and other
drug paraphernalia.
Question
Did the search violate the Fourth and Fourteenth
Amendments?
Conclusion
No. Citing the peculiarities associated with
searches on school grounds, the Court abandoned its requirement that searches be
conducted only when a "probable cause" exists that an individual has violated
the law. The Court used a less strict standard of "reasonableness" to conclude
that the search did not violate the Constitution. The presence of rolling papers
in the purse gave rise to a reasonable suspicion in the principal's mind that
T.L.O. may have been carrying drugs, thus, justifying a more thorough search of
the purse.